Stamp-Based Gamification as Low-Tech Immersive Media in Museums
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65638/2978-8811.2026.02.01Keywords:
Immersive media, Gamification, Museum UX, Stamp-based model, Embodied interaction, Museum studies, Low-tech interactionAbstract
In the field of immersive media and user experience, museums are increasingly understood as hybrid media environments in which physical space, narrative structures, and interactive interfaces jointly shape the visitor’s experience. Gamification has emerged as a key tool in this process; however, its immersive function—particularly in non-digital forms—remains insufficiently theorized. This article analyzes the stamp-based gamification model (“passport with stamps”, hereafter SBM) as a form of low-tech immersive media that structures visitor movement, attention, and motivation across different museum contexts.
The study employs a qualitative cross-case analysis combined with a research through design (RtD) approach, examining multiple institutions, including natural history, archaeological, historical, and literary museums, as well as educational observatories. Empirical material consists of project documentation and systematic observations of visitor behavior, interpreted through predefined UX criteria. Immersion is operationalized through three user experience modes—cognitive, aesthetic, and narrative—captured via indicators such as route completion, dwell time, and interaction style.
Findings indicate that stamp-based gamification mediates immersion in a context-dependent manner. Route completion rates range from 78% among adult visitors in narratively structured museums to 42% among children in visually fragmented natural history settings, revealing significant variation in how the same mechanic supports different immersive outcomes. The results show that materiality, bodily action, and temporal sequencing play a central role in sustaining engagement, even in the absence of digital technologies.
The study contributes to immersive media and UX theory by arguing that low-tech, embodied, and temporally structured interactions can function as immersive media when they are coherently integrated into spatial and narrative scenarios. Based on the comparative analysis, the article proposes theoretically grounded design principles for low-tech immersive media, emphasizing alignment with spatial logic, bodily engagement, and control over experiential rhythm.
References
Bennett T. The birth of the museum. London: Routledge; 1995.
Brown E, Cairns P. A grounded investigation of game immersion. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; 2004. p. 1297-1300. https://doi.org/10.1145/985921.986048
Deci EL, Ryan RM. The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol Inq. 2000; 11(4): 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Deterding S, Dixon D, Khaled R, Nacke L. From game design elements to gamefulness: defining gamification. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference; 2011. p. 9-15. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040
Dourish P. Where the action is: the foundations of embodied interaction. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 2001. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7221.001.0001
Falk JH, Dierking LD. The museum experience revisited. London: Routledge; 2013.
Hassenzahl M. Experience design: technology for all the right reasons. San Rafael (CA): Morgan & Claypool; 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-02191-6
Johnson M, Kim S, Lee H. Embodied design and low-tech immersive interactions in museums. Museum Manag Curatorship. 2020; 35(3): 250-268.
Law E, Vermeeren A, Roto V. Cross-case UX evaluation methods. Int J Hum Comput Stud. 2018; 112: 12-25.
Mavrin I, Mesić H, Banović AP. Gamification and immersive experiences in museums as audience development strategy: the case of Croatian museums. Collegium Antropol. 2023; 47(4): 21-35. https://doi.org/10.5671/ca.47.4.5
Nicholson S. A recipe for meaningful gamification. In: Deterding S, Dixon D, editors. Gamification in education and business. Cham: Springer; 2015. p. 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10208-5_1
Nora P. Between memory and history: les lieux de mémoire. Representations. 1989; (26): 7-24. https://doi.org/10.2307/2928520
Ross M. Interpreting the new museology. London: Routledge; 2004.
Sangamuang S, Wongwan N, Intawong K, Khanchai S, Puritat K. Gamification in virtual reality museums: effects on hedonic and eudaimonic experiences in cultural heritage learning. Informatics. 2025; 12(1): 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics12010027
Smith R, Lee J. Physical vs digital gamification in museum visitor experience. J Mus Educ. 2021; 46(2): 145-162.
Kim S, Lee H, Johnson M. Designing embodied low-tech immersive experiences: a comparative study. Journal of Museum Interaction. 2019; 8(3): 102-118.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
