Vol. 1 (2025)
Articles

Are Consumers Ready to Shop in Immersive Shopping Environments (ISE)? A Pilot Study to Explore the Factors

Lau Kung Wong
Hong Kong Shue Yan University, Hong Kong, China

Published 2025-12-22

Keywords

  • Immersive Shopping Environment,
  • Word-of-Mouth,
  • Immersive Experiences,
  • Purchase Intention,
  • social interaction

Abstract

Extended Reality (XR) and immersive technologies are redefining the retail landscape by offering interactive, experiential alternatives to conventional online shopping. Immersive experiences within XR shopping platforms have the potential to create distinctive consumer journeys, enabling social interaction that fosters trust and strengthens purchase intentions. This pilot study investigates factors influencing consumers’ purchase intentions and expected experiences within immersive shopping environments (ISE), using Meta’s Horizon Worlds as a case. Specifically, it examines the key roles of immersive experiences, such as social presence, social interaction, and social support, in shaping trust, electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM), and technology acceptance. Beyond social dimensions, this study conceptually situates ISE within immersive user experience (UX) research, acknowledging the importance of sensory engagement, interactivity, realism, and avatar embodiment as foundational characteristics of immersive commerce.Findings reveal that social presence and support significantly enhance trust, while social interaction does not. This non-significant effect suggests that not all immersive social interactions translate into meaningful trust formation, particularly when avatar-mediated exchanges lack emotional richness or perceived authenticity.

References

  1. Beck, J. T., Koskie, K., & Locander, W. B. (2023). How electronic word of mouth (eWOM) shapes consumer social media shopping. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 40(3), 291–302.
  2. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-01-2023-5817
  3. Beldad, A., De Jong, M., & Steehouder, M. (2010). How shall I trust the faceless and the intangible? A literature review on the antecedents of online trust. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 857–869.
  4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.013
  5. Bulsara, H. P., & Vaghela, P. S. (2023). Trust and online purchase intention: A systematic literature review through meta-analysis. International Journal of Electronic Business, 18(2), 148–164.
  6. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEB.2023.130155
  7. Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310–357.
  8. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310
  9. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
  10. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  11. Deci, E. L., Eghrari, H., Patrick, B. C., & Leone, D. R. (1994). Facilitating internalization: The self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality, 62(1), 119–142.
  12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb00797.x
  13. DiMarket. (2024). Virtual shopping platform market expansion: Growth outlook 2025–2033. Retrieved from https://www.datainsightsmarket.com/reports/virtual-shopping-platform-510435#
  14. Erkan, I., & Evans, C. (2018). Social media or shopping websites? The influence of electronic word of mouth on consumers’ online purchase intentions. Journal of Marketing Communications, 24(6), 617–632.
  15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2016.1184706
  16. Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. D. (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1), 38–52.
  17. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.10073
  18. Hsiao, K. L., Lin, J. C. C., Wang, X. Y., Lu, H. P., & Yu, H. (2010). Antecedents and consequences of trust in online product recommendations: An empirical study in social shopping. Online Information Review, 34(6), 935–953.
  19. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684521011099414
  20. Kim, B. (2011). Understanding antecedents of continuance intention in social-networking services. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(4), 199–205.
  21. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0009
  22. Kim, A. J., & Ko, E. (2010). Impacts of luxury fashion brand’s social media marketing on customer relationship and purchase intention. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 1(3), 164–171.
  23. https://doi.org/10.1080/20932685.2010.10593068
  24. Kim, S., & Park, H. (2013). Effects of various characteristics of social commerce (s-commerce) on consumers’ trust and trust performance. International Journal of Information Management, 33(2), 318–332.
  25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.11.006
  26. Lam, S. T., Lau, K. W., & Lau, H. F. (2014). The role of mixed-emotion in shaping consumers’ behavior: A study of online and brick-and-mortar fashion retailing in Hong Kong. Applied Economics and Business Review, 1(2), 31–39.
  27. https://doi.org/10.12966/aebr.04.01.2014
  28. Lau, K. W., & Lee, P. Y. (2019). Shopping in virtual reality: A study on consumers’ shopping experience in a stereoscopic virtual reality. Virtual Reality, Special Issue: Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality and Commerce.
  29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-018-0362-3
  30. Lau, K. W., & Lee, P. Y. (2018). How technology affects our ways of shopping? A historical analysis on the use of technologies in retailing. International Journal of Research, Innovation and Commercialisation, 1(2), 158–170.
  31. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJRIC.2017.091083
  32. Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. (1985). Trust as a social reality. Social Forces, 63(4), 967–985.
  33. https://doi.org/10.2307/2578601
  34. Liang, T. P., Ho, Y. T., Li, Y. W., & Turban, E. (2011). What drives social commerce: The role of social support and relationship quality. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 16(2), 69–90.
  35. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEC1086-4415160204
  36. Li, X., Yang, C., & Wang, S. (2023). Research on the impact of intercustomer social support on customer engagement behaviors in virtual brand communities. Behavioral Sciences, 13(1), 31.
  37. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13010031
  38. Oh, C. S., Bailenson, J. N., & Welch, G. F. (2018). A systematic review of social presence: Definition, antecedents, and implications. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 5, Article 114.
  39. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00114
  40. Nguyen, Q. H., Truong, T. H., Nhi, N. L. M., Anh, D. N., & Linh, H. T. (2025). The impacts of virtual try-on for online shopping on consumer purchase intention: The moderating role of technology experience. Cogent Business & Management, 12(1), 2500774.
  41. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2025.2500774
  42. Nusair, K., Bilgihan, A., Okumus, F., & Cobanoglu, C. (2013). Generation Y travelers’ commitment to online social network websites. Tourism Management, 35, 13–22.
  43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2012.05.005
  44. Ramayah, T., & Ignatius, J. (2005). Impact of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and perceived enjoyment on intention to shop online. ICFAI Journal of Management Research, 4(10), 54–73.
  45. Rempel, J. K., Holmes, J. G., & Zanna, M. P. (1985). Trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(1), 95–112.
  46. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.1.95
  47. Schurr, P. H., & Ozanne, J. L. (1985). Influences on exchange processes: Buyers’ preconceptions of a seller’s trustworthiness and bargaining toughness. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(4), 939–953.
  48. https://doi.org/10.1086/209028
  49. Voicu, M.-C., Sîrghi, N., & Toth, D. M.-M. (2023). Consumers’ experience and satisfaction using augmented reality apps in e-shopping: New empirical evidence. Applied Sciences, 13(17), 9596.
  50. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13179596
  51. Weisberg, J., Te’eni, D., & Arman, L. (2011). Past purchase and intention to purchase in e-commerce: The mediation of social presence and trust. Internet Research, 21(1), 82–96.
  52. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662241111104893
  53. Zhang, H., Lu, Y., Gupta, S., & Zhao, L. (2014). What motivates customers to participate in social commerce? The impact of technological environments and virtual customer experiences. Information & Management, 51(8), 1017–1030.
  54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.07.005
  55. Zhang, P., & Wang, C. (2012). The evolution of social commerce: An examination from the people, business, technology, and information perspective. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 31, 105–127.
  56. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.03105